Пересказ: This Is Worse Than a Nuke - и Netanyahu Is Close

This Is Worse Than a Nuke\u2026 and Netanyahu Is Close.

Источник: https://tuckercarlson.com/avrum-burg-highlights

[Транскрипт]

Avrum Burg [00:17:13] Or maybe both. Maybe at the same time, we have opportunities, and the threats are better threats, so to say. Let's look at numbers just for a second. When I was a student, I mean, at elementary school, a pupil, we were told that in 48, the year in which the state of Israel was born, seven Arab armies invaded the just-born state of Israel. So 48 it was 7 versus 1. In 67, 19 years later, it was only three out of the seven, Jordan, Egypt, and Syria. Six years later in 73, it only two out of three, only Syria and Egypt. Ever since, as broken as it is and as chilly as it is, with Egypt, we have a peace agreement. And Syria, in a very good day, is a dysfunctioning threat. So you can, and the Palestinian issue that was not there in 48, the way it is today, was born along the road. So you say, listen, in eight decades, 48 to 26, from seven armies to half a problem, which is the Palestinian one, this is an evolution. This is a positive progress, and in a way it it. And this is... Before we count in the potential of Saudi Arabia, the potential of the Emirates, et cetera, et cetera, on the other hand, two elements emerged as well. The first is Israel that at least in three stages in its life was fully accepted among the family of nations. It's 48 and it's euphoria. 67 and the eruption of redemptive feelings all over the world, maybe, and the atrocities of October 7th, 23. Three times that Israel in conflict time, this is beside David, beside Oslo, beside other positive peace agreements, but in a conflict situation, that Israel was well received and well accepted in the world. And then we must ask ourselves, how was it wasted? How comes that two years ago, three years ago in 23, Israel was so well sympathized with all over the world and now so despised? So the threat of being rejected, of being a world pariah, maybe it's not a military one, but it's a deeper one. It's an existential one. And the other is assuming that the Iranians would have had a nuclear capability. Very soon will lead to a chain of reactions that others will have nuclear weapons in the Middle East without using the weapons, but a Middle East with mass-destruction weapons is a different scale of a threat for many, but for Israel especially. So I will say, yes, we have better relationship with many and the situation is not 48, is not 67, is even 23. But the threats are not gone. They were transformed and different and require different strategy and philosophy and value system to address.